{"id":5430,"date":"2022-04-04T08:52:08","date_gmt":"2022-04-04T08:52:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sageitinc.com\/?p=5430"},"modified":"2022-08-17T11:13:18","modified_gmt":"2022-08-17T11:13:18","slug":"embracing-event-driven-microservices-architectures","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sageitinc.com\/blog\/embracing-event-driven-microservices-architectures","title":{"rendered":"Embracing Event-Driven Microservices Architectures"},"content":{"rendered":"

Microservices architectures (MSA) break down domain-level problems into independent modular capacities so they become easier to manage and deploy, which is great for many situations. When that system is organized around events \u2014 an event-driven microservices architecture (EDM) \u2014 you are streamlining microservices into event-defined clusters, which then function faster and with improved productivity than they did in a monolithic formation. This event-driven microservices architecture offers benefits that you won\u2019t find in other MSA patterns.<\/p>\n

There are challenges, too, however. Scaling an MSA, for example, is more complex than scaling a monolith because the microservice design has so many more moving parts. While you may want to simply duplicate your entire function in a new setting, you may also only need to scale elements of it. Both cases require a careful analysis of how the scaled elements will impact the existing system so you can design around their particular concerns.<\/p>\n

Why Event-Driven Integration Architecture (EDA)?<\/strong><\/p>\n